Guild Wars 2 Wiki talk:Policy

Archive

---

• Years 2007 - 2008
• Year 2009
• Years 2009 - 2010

Refuted

Why are all the proposals given the title of refuted? Last time I checked, that meant that they lacked accuracy or were erroneous. What is factually incorrect about this list of delete reasons? Or perhaps this guideline on common sense? What about the procedure for RfA? I would hardly call these refuted. Also, nothing is very descriptive on this page now. For instance, there is a plethora of conduct proposals, but each discus different topics. Unless you read the link, you cannot tell what it is. Abandoned or not, these articles should be better named. Venom20 13:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I would have gone with rescind or repeal myself. Venom20 22:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I like "rescinded". Join the discussion about this at the other page. Erasculio 22:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I recommend "bullshit." 22:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Wow. All I can say to this at the moment. In any case, refuted is horrible wording, which I will change right now. --Xeeron 16:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

It was said and discussed here. Ariyen 16:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

I seriously propose "suspended." 17:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

"I seriously propose "suspended."" I thought you proposed bullshit ;) Venom20 18:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

So...

Is anyone not okay with "suspended?" 05:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Is that to say that you oppose it or are you just wondering? --Kyoshi (Talk) 13:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

No, I proposed it. I detected some frustration that the discussion petered out, so I'd like to act on what we more or less decided. 18:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Okay. I still say "archived" would be better but "suspended" is fine with me. --Kyoshi (Talk) 18:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm good with suspended, it's not factually incorrect. Venom20 20:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

+1 A F K When Needed 23:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

+1 - Infinite - talk 07:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)