User talk:Redshift/Methods

You are absolutly, positivly, no-question-about-it, greyly unsound.

IDK-- Necro Shea Mo 03:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

I am not sure what you mean, sir. As for your last insinuation, you are correct that I am grey. Grey, grey, grey. Redshift 11:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

With a little discussion and alteration I can see this working out as a general guideline for wiki article formatting (and thus am wondering if you would wish to spark suck a discussion). - Infinite - talk 12:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

There's an awful lot of subtext going along in this comment thread. :D. But more seriously, I think it would be...constructive to continue discussion on such matters. Again, my intent in 'Methods' was simply to at least have a place to think about my own guidelines and have them be somewhat reasoned, even as they might evolve. As such, I would indeed be interested in participating in such discussions. Sooner rather than later would also be welcome: I feel that it would be in the interest of moving forward with documentation (especially, fingers crossed, as we head into convention season) to be at least on the same page with some point of reasoned reference as opposed to individually wondering if an edit needs to be made or reverted on a growing number of pages. I hope this helps to clarify where I'm coming from. Redshift 13:41, 17 July 2011 (UTC)