Talk:GuildWars2.com news

The Ten ton hammer interview was posted 6 days ago, why the reaction lag? o.O 98.23.29.7 03:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

They (ArenaNet) always take longer to post interviews officially, even if they already know about them. It's probably because of preparations.-- Shew 03:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Aaah, I see. Thanks! 98.23.29.7 16:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Ordinals

I've changed this once, but it was reverted. I don't like having "st," "nd," "rd," and "th" appended to the numbers in the dates. First of all, they aren't written like that on the website, from which we're importing this article's content, and secondly, the modern trend is to leave them off, as they are unnecessary.-- Shew ♠♠♠ 16:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Necessary Page?

Is this page really necessary since we have Guild Wars 2 News Tyrion 14:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

The news page includes information from any official NCsoft or ArenaNet source, whereas this page just contains the news from the GW2 website.-- Shew ♠♠♠ 16:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Should we update this page (extensively) or just say that its redundant and call it a day? Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 04:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Profession Updates?

I've noticed after looking though a lot of Q&A sites, fourms, and blogs that after the Elementist was released that the Warrior was next in line. Well its been over a month, I'm just wondering how many more "weeks" we all have to wait for another professions outline or info to appear on the GW2 site? Last time before a profession was released there was somewhat of an outline that appeared before the Elementist was revealed in its place with a full discription and 4 short skill samples of what they can do. -- Slash, BURN!, Delete... 06:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

So like

Anyone feeling particulary motivated to get this back up to date or shall we fuck it all and post a link to the news somewhere else and delete this article accordingly? I don't think listing historical news is particulary informative. - Infinite - talk 09:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I think this along with the blog specific page is all going to the main news page at the moment... which we're doing a fairly crap job of updating as is. The less of these 'must be up to date' pages at this stage the better. :) -- aspectacle  11:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)