Talk:Game updates/2013-05-14

Update 2

How many downloads were there? "Update 2" implies two separate updates. My impression is that there was one update, but some changes were not included in the original release notes. If there was only one update, perhaps the notes could be moved to the end of the original post under "addendum" or something similar. 75.36.182.167 18:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

There was only one update. I've updated the patch notes and added a wiki note to reflect this. The "Update 2" was inaccurate and should never have been added to begin with. -- Tarun (talk) 21:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Since there's now a proper Update 2 that came with a new build, it's been added. However, the previous false one was added to the first update as Additional Notes. -- Tarun (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Build Notes

I'm curious, why are we now including what Build number it is? - Stimpson J Kat 08:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Because one user insists that it's useful. —Dr Ishmael 14:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

dont we have a history of telling singular users with silly notions to bugger off? i seem to remember one even getting a year long ban cos of it >.> -Auron 14:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Where's the harm in including the build number? It means something to ANet, but nothing of value to most players. Still, it's not as if it takes up a lot of space. 75.37.19.141 05:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

And then we end up with a Notes section with nothing to note.--Relyk ~ talk < 05:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)