User talk:Panderichthys4244

Stop

Stop tagging those articles for deletion; they do have content. Also, edits like this and this are vandalism, so consider this your last warning. poke | talk 19:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Well,they hardly do. - User:Panderichthys4244 19:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

You are now blocked for a day. As I said above, these pages do have content, despite what you believe about it. The particular last article you have been tagging for deletion has all probably all information that can be said about these creatures, which makes them good enough for documentation purposes. If you think an article needs more content, and you are certain that there can be more content added, then you are free to add {{stub}} to it to mark it as uncomplete.

That being said, speedy deletions are solely reserved for unobjectionable deletions, which these obviously are not. But even with the normal deletion process, these deletions wouldn’t go through as per above reasons. In addition, reverting a second time is considered vandalism; if you disagree with a revert then you are free to start a discussion about on the talk page. Since I did come to your talk page for the whole batch of your edits though, this would have been the appropriate place to discuss this.

You are free to bring this up again after your block expires, but be clear that none of your delete tags would actually go through. poke | talk 20:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

forgot to tell you that im glad that my three month block is over. - Panderichthys4244 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Please don't use the {{user}} template as your signature, it's not intended for that purpose. —Dr Ishmael 00:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Spambots

You can post on my talk page to report them if you find any with long abuse filter histories, not sure any other sysops care quite as much. -Auron 02:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Don't flag stub works for vandalism

This is undoing work. --Cronos (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

on a tangent from Auron's talk page...

I do wonder why you seem to be spending so much of your time looking at AF logs. That's not something most non-admin users would ever need to worry about, so it seems odd that you're taking an interest in it. —Dr Ishmael 05:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I've said it before and I'll say it again - I'll never trust him. --Ventriloquist 10:41, 24 December 2014 (UTC)