Template talk:Main
Use of[edit]
I'm noticing that we don't use this template as much as I might otherwise expect we should? Is there a previously established rule for when we would or would not be using this template? I'm, of course, speaking only of instances where this template would be used in the first place; just, in which of that subset of instances, should we use this template in lieu of a link to the article's main page in the subsection's text? —Jyavoc 06:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- It probably should be used more than it is. I usually try to make use of it wherever I can when I'm editing large articles, in order to cut down on the amount of redundant info. —Dr Ishmael 06:32, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Font size[edit]
Can the text size be made normal? Its current small size makes it look like a footnote or something unimportant. I looked on the wikipedia site and they have normal sized text there, making it a lot more apparent. For example, search for "health" on there to see it. --Alad 12:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see any reason why not. Changed. —Dr Ishmael 13:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- That was fast, thanks! And it's a lot more visible now too! --Alad 14:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)