Template talk:About

I do not think this template should be deleted, because it is more flexible than {{otheruses}}. —Proton 21:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

But then we've got two templates that perform similarly? Would it be better to improve the "otheruses" one? Xu Davella 21:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Erm, other uses is fine. If there is one other use, we just need otheruses, and if there is more than one other use, we can use otheruses+disambig. Supports deletion. Aqua (T|C) 21:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

My preference is to change {{otheruses}} to Wikipedia's form (which is what inspired the addition of {{about}} in the first place). On Wikipedia, {{otheruses}} is a special case of {{about}}, and I intend to make it the same here. —Proton 21:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Let me reiterate: we have a completely functional system already. Just because it is used on wikipedia doesn't mean we can't have an equally functioning system here without using wikipedia. Otheruses is fine as is, and this template should be deleted. Aqua (T|C) 21:22, 21 March 2011 (UTC)