Talk:Sorrow's Furnace

I agree with the move. Not much else to say. --Odal talk 18:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I actually disagree with it, because that map just refers to content in the book that few people have even read yet. I don't think we should be so hasty in moving it unless someone can supply concrete evidence that it has been renamed. The map of that book is a little off anyways, and doesn't include a lot of things. Sorrows Embrace might simply be the entrance to sorrows furnace, or maybe a spot where a lot of dwarves died. Who knows yet? Themastermoo 20:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

1) "that few people have even read yet" - The whole point of a Wiki is to provide information. That hosting certain information (such as a correct name) would fulfil the task of a Wiki is not a deterrent, and should not be one.

2) "Sorrows Embrace might simply be the entrance to sorrows furnace, or..." - Infinitely better logic which has convinced me personally, if nobody else. A F K When Needed 21:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Too soon to tell if it was renamed. -- Konig/talk 22:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

If we're going to describe it here as a "dungeon", it probably should be merged with Sorrow's Embrace, which has been confirmed as a dungeon in gameplay. – NuclearDuckie 13:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

The term "dungeon" in this article comes from GW1's meaning, since its version predates what we've learned of dungeons in GW2. That is, SF in GW1 was an instanced isolated area (that is, not part of the map which was directly linked to the cartographer title). This article actually needs a rewording. -- Konig/talk 17:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)