Talk:Device kit

It makes me happy that you can actually see the backpack. Now if only the bows had quivers... Zolann The Irreverent 20:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Super Bold is Super!

As seen here... why is the Backpack kit super bold? --~~Lotus~~ 05:25, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

The wikicode treats intra-wiki-linking an article on its own page as bold text, so the software won't create a massive recursion vortex of doom and destroy the multiverse as we know. Plus we always link the first instance of articles, and it just so happens that the first instance of Bomb Satchel or Backpack Kit (or any other article) is at the top of the article.

On a more applied note, the bolding is only added emphasis, just to remind the reader of what article he or she is reading. --Riddle 05:53, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Table

Yes, it looks amazing. But can we not use it for profession exclusive skill types? Listing the profession is redundant and if you take it out, the table is two columns wide, which doesn't look right. --Xu Davella 22:45, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

It seems to be quite common among other exclusive skill types already. Personally, I don't really mind listing the profession. The table with proper color scheme immediately tells you which profession's skills these are even if you get but a glimpse. I guess that's not the point, but... Mediggo 05:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation/Merge

I was going around adding disambiguation pages to skill types (forms for form, etc.) and it occured to me that an obvious mistake for Backpack and Weapon Kit is "Kit/Kits" - I didn't know whether it would be worth merging the types of backpack kit, so for now I just put a small disambig on this page (as backpack kit seemed the more general of the two topics). Revert as suits. =) Alathaea 08:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)